<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supremes tighten their  Belton </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattcameronlaw.com/2009/04/supremes-tighten-their-belton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattcameronlaw.com/2009/04/supremes-tighten-their-belton/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:21:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph J. Goldberg-Giuliano, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.mattcameronlaw.com/2009/04/supremes-tighten-their-belton/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph J. Goldberg-Giuliano, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattcameronlaw.com/?p=794#comment-143</guid>
		<description>You have to wonder whether cops will start deliberately leaving defendants close to their vehicles, just as an excuse to search.

At least we now have a uniform method for applying Belton. A rare and welcome pro-4th Amendment decision from the current court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wonder whether cops will start deliberately leaving defendants close to their vehicles, just as an excuse to search.</p>
<p>At least we now have a uniform method for applying Belton. A rare and welcome pro-4th Amendment decision from the current court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
